SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ALLU GUPTA @ DHARMENDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 69

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22465

of 2021

Applicant :- Allu Gupta @ Dharmendra Gupta

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rinki Gupta

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for

the State-respondent through vedio conferencing.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he

has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next

submitted that general role has been assigned to the applicant

alongwith other co-accused out of which co-accused Chandan

@ Karan Gupta and Anshu Tiwari have already been enlarged

on bail by this Court vide orders dated 4.2.2021 & 3.2.2021 in

Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 5491 of 2021 & 5503 of

2021. Applicant is having criminal history of one case, which is

explained in the affidavit. He is languishing in jail since

7.4.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse

the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not

dispute the aforesaid facts.

Considering the material on record as well as the dictum of

Ape

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top