SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRIKANT – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


1

AFR

Court No. - 84

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14192 of 2021

Applicant :- Srikant

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Muktesh Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

1. Heard Sri Muktesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate

General alongwith Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned Additional

Government Advocate-I and Ms. Akansha Gaur, learned State

Law Officer for the State opposite party.

2. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 19731 has been filed seeking to quash the

charge sheet dated 14.05.2015 as well as the cognizance order

dated 06.04.2016 and also the entire proceedings of Case

No.210 of 2016 (State vs. Srikant and Others), arising out of

Case Crime No.149 of 2015, under Section 3/4 of the

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 18942, Police

Station Jigna, District Mirzapur pending before the 4th

Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mirzapur.

3. The records of the case indicate that the criminal

proceedings were initiated pursuant to an FIR dated

26.03.2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top