Court No. - 73

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 4713 of 2021

Applicant :- Arun Kumar Bansal

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- R.P.S. Chauhan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashok Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Shri

Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

informant and learned A.G.A for the State.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been

filed on behalf of the applicant, Arun Kumar

Bansal, with a prayer to release him on bail in

Case Crime No.453 of 2017(Case No. 191 of 2018),

under Sections- 420,467,468,471 IPC, Police

Station- Gandhi Park District- Aligarh, during

pendency of trial.

Applicant has approached this court after

cognizance on the charge sheet has submitted

against him.He has already challenged the charge

sheet dated 27.7.2018 in application under section

482 No. 38990 of 2018 which was disposed of

directing the applicant to move discharge

application before the court below within three

weeks,thereafter apply for bail. The bail

application was directed to be decided as per

judgement of Amrawati and another Vs. State of

U.P. reported in 2004(57),ALR-290 as well as

judgement of Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap

Singh Vs. State of U.P.,2009(3) ADJ,322(322) (SC).

Thereafter applicant moved discharge application

before the court below which was rejected by

order dated 22.11.2019. He has already

challenged the aforesaid order by filing the

application under section 482 Cr.P.c. No.8114 of

2020, which is pending.

In view of the fact that applicant has already

approached this court, application is barred by

paragraph 45 (8) of the judgement dated

05.04.2021 passed by this Court in Criminal

Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438

Cr.P.C. No. 2110 of 2021, Shivam Vs. State of

U.P. and Another,hence this anticipatory bail

application deserves to be rejected.

It is accordingly, rejected.

Order Date :- 7.4.2021

Atul kr. sri.