ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DILSHAD – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
BAIL 28002/2019
In Chamber
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28002 of
2019
Applicant :- Dilshad
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Awadhesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
This bail application has been taken up during lock-down
period as an urgent one.
Perused the records as well as written objection filed on
behalf of the learned Additional Government Advocate Sri
Raghuraj Kishore Mishra.
The applicant is seeking bail in connection with case crime
no. 411 of 2019, under Section 8 of 20 of Narcotic Drugs
and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, P.S. Phase-2
NOIDA,District Gautam Budh Nagar, (for short NDPS
Act).
The allegation against the applicant in the first information
report is that the applicant was carrying psychotropic
substance in the form charas to the tune of 2.15 Kgs. It is
pleaded by the applicant the prosecution has not complied
with the mandatory procedural requirement of Section 50
of the NDPS Act. It has been further pleaded that the
applicant has no criminal history and he has been falsely
implicated in the present case. The laboratory report of the
alleged recovery has yet not been received to prosecute the
applicant with the aforesaid charge. The applicant is in jail
since 22.06.2019.
In view of overall facts and circumstance of the case, and
the fact that there is no past criminal of the applicant
which is not disputed in the written objection filed by
learned AGA and without entering into the merits of the
case and all other aspects involved in the matter that can
be looked into at the stage of trial, the Court is of the
opinion that the applicant is entitled to be admitted to bail.
Accordingly, applicant namely Dilshad is admitted to bail.
Considering the special circumstances of the lock-down
prevailing in the district concerned presently and in the
light of the directions of this Court in PIL No. 564 of 2020
dated 06.04.2020, let the applicant, Dilshad be enlarged on
bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a
personal bond only to the satisfaction of the jail
authorities, where the applicant is languishing.
It is further provided that this bail order available on the
official website of the High Court will be taken to be the
authentic one.
However, it is further directed that within period of four
weeks from the date of lifting of the complete lock-down
in the District concerned resulting in resumption of normal
functioning of the Courts in that district, the applicant shall
furnish two sureties each of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned alongwith certified
copy of this order, failing which the bail granted by this
court shall stand cancelled necessitating surrender of the
applicant.
It is further directed that the applicant shall not misuse the
liberty of bail and shall cooperate with the police/
investigating agency.
Office of the Government Advocate is directed to inform
forthwith about this bail order to the the S.P/S.S.P of the
district concerned for necessary information to the jail
authority where the applicant is languishing.
In view of the aforesaid, the bail application stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.5.2020
Sanjeev