SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(All) 45

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAGHUVEER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS – Respondent


Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari,J.

1. I have heard Sri Akash Gupta holding brief of Sri T.S. Dabas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 2.1.2003, passed by the District Magistrate, Rampur in Case No. 397 of 1999 under Section 17 of the Arms Act, 1959, (State Vs. Raghuveer Singh) (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) by which the petitioner’s Fire Arms Licence No. 1240/TT of double-barrel gun No. 7882 was cancelled. The appellate order dated 24.8.2006 passed by the Commissioner, Moradabad Mandal, Moradabad dismissing the petitioner’s Appeal No. 26/02-03 under Section 18 of The Arms Act, 1959 (Ram Prasad Vs. State of U.P.) District Rampur (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) is also under challenge.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner was granted licence No. 1240/TT of double-barrel gun on 2.9.1995. A criminal case, bearing Crime Case No. 181 of 1999 under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) (X) of The Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S. Milak, District R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top