SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANSHU SINGH', '', 'HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH', 'G A']

Court No. - 76

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13633 of 2020

Applicant :- Manoj

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Anshu Singh,Hemendra Pratap Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned

Additional Government Advocate representing the

State and perused the record of the case.

By means of this application, the applicant, who is

involved in Case Crime No. 654 of 2018, under

Sections 452, 324 and 308 IPC, police station

Khair, district Aligarh, is seeking enlargement on

bail during the trial.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant

that the applicant is absolutely innocent has

falsely been implicated in the present case with

some ulterior motive. It is further submitted by

learned counsel for the applicant that on

13.10.2018 informant Laxman Gautam lodged

F.I.R. against ten persons including the applicant

alleging that in the incident dated 12.10.2018 two

persons namely, Devicharan Gautam and Savitri

Devi Gautam received injuries. Injury report

reveals that injuries are caused by hard and blunt

object. Injury No. 1 of Devicha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top