SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAEED AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJIV SISODIA', '', 'DHIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', 'G A']

Court No. - 43

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11157 of 2020

Applicant :- Saeed Ahmad And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar

Srivastava

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.

Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.

1. Heard Sri Mohd. Bilal, Advocate holding brief of Sri

Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava for the applicants, Sri Gyanendra

Prasad Mahant, learned counsel for the informant and Sri

Deepak Mishra, learned AGA.

2. Applicants have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

for quashing of the charge-sheet no. 118 of 2019 dated

13.05.2019 and its cognizance order dated 28.02.2020 in a case

arising out of Case Crime No. 19 of 2019, under Sections 420,

467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station-Mandawar, District-Bijnor

pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior

Division)/FTC, Bijnor.

3. It is submitted that allegation on the present applicants is that

they have encroached upon the land of the pond, contained in

gata no. 1936, have illegally sold 1100 sq. mts. of land and have

facilitated illegal encroachment over the said public utility land.

It is further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top