SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DEEN DAYAL AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 80

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1069 of 2020

Petitioner :- Deen Dayal And 3 Others

Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Chandra Mishra

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

Heard Sri Arvind Prabodh Dubey, learned counsel holding brief

of Sri Nitin Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners,

learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 and

Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent

No.3-Gaon Sabha.

The following prayer is made in the instant writ petition:

"To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the

respondent No.1 to decide the interim application pending in the Second

Appeal No.3131 of 2019 (Deen Dayal Vs. Umesh Narayan Shahi) within

stipulated period and further direct the parties concern to maintain status

quo till the disposal of the interim application pending before the

respondent No.1."

Sri Arvind Prabodh Dubey, learned counsel holding brief of Sri

Nitin Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners

contends that the application for interim relief was filed along

with memo of appeal in the Second Appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top