SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHASHI VAISHYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


1

Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26984 of 2017

Petitioner :- Shashi Vaishya

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Madan Lal Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J.

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing

Counsel for the respondents.

2.

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer

to quash the order dated 4.5.2017 passed by the District Magistrate,

Sonbhadra/respondent No.2.

3.

Subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, an amendment

application was filed by the petitioner in the present writ petition. The

said amendment application was allowed vide order dated 27.9.2019.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, an amended copy of the writ petition has

been filed by the petitioner. By the aforesaid amendment application in

the writ petition, a prayer has been made to quash the order dated

6.6.2019 passed by the respondent No.2 with a further prayer to issue a

mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to permit the petitioner to

excavate and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top