1

A.F.R.

Court No. - 66

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10928 of 2020

Petitioner :- Manjul Srivastava

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghan Shyam Maurya

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

1.

The petitioner, Manjul Srivastava has impugned an order of

June the 25^th, 2020, passed by the District Basic Education

Officer, Prayagraj, rejecting her claim for compassionate

appointment under The Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents

of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (for short,

‘the Rules).

2.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent

nos. 2 and 3, which is taken on record.

3.

Mr. Sharad Chandra Upadhyay, learned State Law Officer,

was granted time to file a short counter affidavit. He has not come

up with any return.

4.

Admit.

5.

Heard forthwith.

6.

Heard Mr. Ghan Shyam Maurya, learned Counsel for the

petitioner, Mr. Arun Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf

of respondent nos.2 and 3 and Mr. Sharad Chandra Upadhyay,

learned State Law Officer appearing on behalf of respondent no.1.

7.

The question, that arises for consideration here, is:

“Whether the judgment of this Court in Smt.