SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHD HAJRAT SHEKH @ HAJRAT ALI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 66

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 364 of 2020

Petitioner :- Mohd Hajrat Shekh @ Hajrat Ali And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Kanchan Ranjan

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

Sri Aadesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate has put in appearance

on behalf of petitioner no. 2. It is taken on record.

Heard Ms. Kanchan Ranjan and Sri Aadesh Kumar Srivastava,

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and

learned A.G.A. on behalf of the State- respondents.

A perusal of the report of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Allahabad shows that notice upon respondent nos. 4,5 and 6

has been personally served. However, no one has put in

appearance on their behalf.

In compliance with the rule nisi issued on 03.09.2020, the

detenue-petitioner no. 2, Jubaida Khatoon @ Jubaida Bibi has

been produced before this Court by Lady Constable, Archana

Srivastava (P.N.O.162303751) posted at P.S. Kareilly, District

Prayagraj, who has identified the detenue before this Court. The

Court, accordingly, proceeds to ascertain the detenue's stand in

the matter, which is recorded verbatim:

Q. Aapka naam?

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top