ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HEENA BANO AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
HABC 365 2020
Court No. - 66
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 365 of 2020
Petitioner :- Heena Bano And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Parvesh Kumar Pandey,Sarvesh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
In compliance with the rule nisi issued on 29.09.2020, the
detenue Heena Bano has been produced before this Court by
lady constable, Lata (L/C 366) posted at P.S. Himpur, District
Bijnore, who has identified the detenue. This Court,
accordingly, proceeds to ascertain the stand of the detenue in
the matter, which is recorded verbatim:
Q. Aapka naam?
A. Heena Bano
Q. Aapke pitaji ka naam?
A. Amir Ahmad.
Q. Aapki aayu?
A. 25 years.
Q. Aap kaha se aayi hain?
A. Apne ghar se, mummy-papa ke pas se.
Q. Aapne shadi ki hai?
A. Ji (she nodded her head in affirmation)
Q. Kisse ki hai?
A. Sabir se.
Q. Aapne apni marji se sadi ki hai?
A. Ha.
Q. Aap kiske sath jana chahti hain?
A. Apne husband ke sath nahi jana chahati hu kyoki vo
pareshan karte hai dahej ke liye.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Parvesh Kumar
Pandey and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Government Advocate assisted
by Mr. Indrajeet Singh Yadav, learned A.G.A. appearing on
behalf of the State.
Looking to the stand of the detenue, there is no good ground to
make the rule nisi absolute. It is evident that she is not in illegal
confinement. She is staying with her parents of her free will and
wishes to stay with them.
In the circumstances, the rule nisi cannot be made absolute. It is
discharged and this petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.10.2020
BKM/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.