SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RATI RAM – Appellant
Versus
OM PRAKASH and 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANIL KISHORE SHARMA', '', 'PREM SHANKAR MISHRA', 'C S C', '', 'MAHIPAL SINGH', 'ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA']

Court No. - 50

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 34598 of 2017

Petitioner :- Rati Ram

Respondent :- Om Prakash And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kishore Sharma

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava,Mahipal Singh

Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.

Heard Sri A.K. Sharma, the counsel for the petitioner and Sri

Mahipal Singh, Advocate representing the respondent no.1.

The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated

25.1.2017 passed by the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at

Allahabad.

Through order dated 25.1.2017, the Board of Revenue has

allowed the restoration application filed by the respondent no.1

to restore the reference submitted to him by the Additional

Commissioner. The proceedings relate to cancellation of

allotment made in favour of respondent no.1.

It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that the

reference has been wrongly restored as the delay of 8 years in

filing the restoration application had not been satisfactorily

explained by the respondents and a certified copy of the order-

sheet of the case which has been handed over to the Court

during the course of argument reveals that the conduct of

respondent no. 1 w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top