ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PINTU @ PITIYA – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
BAIL 10849/2020
['PRADEEP YADAV', '', 'NITESH KUMAR SINGH', 'G A']
In Chamber
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10849 of
2020
Applicant :- Pintu @ Pitiya
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Yadav,Nitesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
This bail application has been taken up during lock-down
period as an urgent one.
Perused the records.
The applicant is seeking bail in connection with case crime
no. 109 of 2019, under Section 8 of 20 of Narcotic Drugs
and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, P.S. Ranipur,
District Mau (for short NDPS Act).
The allegation against the applicant in the first information
report is that the applicant was carrying psychotropic
substance in the form ganja to the tune of 1 kg and 800
grams. It has been pleaded that the entire case is planted
one and no recovery has been made from the possession of
the applicant inasmuch as, there is no independent eye
witness account of the recovery. It has been further
pleaded that the prosecution has not complied with the
mandatory procedural requirement of Section 42, 42(1),
42(2) and 50 of the NDPS Act. It has been further pleaded
that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present
case due to ulterior motive. The laboratory report of the
alleged recovery has yet not been received to prosecute the
applicant with the aforesaid charge. Criminal history has
been admitted to the extent stated in the bail rejection
order. The applicant is in jail since 12.07.2019
In view of overall facts and circumstance of the case, the
Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be
admitted to bail.
Accordingly, applicant namely Pintu @ Pitiya is admitted
to bail. Considering the special circumstances of the lock-
down prevailing in the district concerned presently and in
the light of the directions of this Court in PIL No. 564 of
2020 dated 06.04.2020, let the applicant, Pintu @ Pitiya be
enlarged on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his
furnishing a personal bond only to the satisfaction of the
jail authorities, where the applicant is languishing.
It is further provided that this bail order available on the
official website of the High Court will be taken to be the
authentic one.
However, it is further directed that within period of four
weeks from the date of lifting of the complete lock-down
in the District concerned resulting in resumption of normal
functioning of the Courts in that district, the applicant shall
furnish two sureties each of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned alongwith certified
copy of this order, failing which the bail granted by this
court shall stand cancelled necessitating surrender of the
applicant.
It is further directed that the applicant shall not misuse the
liberty of bail and shall cooperate with the police/
investigating agency.
Office of the Government Advocate is directed to inform
forthwith about this bail order to the the S.P/S.S.P of the
district concerned for necessary information to the jail
authority where the applicant is languishing.
In view of the aforesaid, the bail application stands
disposed of
Order Date :- 30.4.2020
Sanjeev