SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAM BHAROSE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONDOLIDATION AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 68

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2972 of 2019

Petitioner :- Ram Bharose And Another

Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Condolidation And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Raj Prajapati

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. Heard Mr. Ram Raj Prajapati, learned counsel for the

petitioners and learned Standing Counsel.

2. Challenge raised in the present petition is to the order dated

8.6.2018 passed by Settlement Officer of Consolidation,

Hamirpur in appeal no. 17/76 whereby he had allowed the

amendment application moved by the private respondent no.3

and others. That order has been confirmed in revision by

Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hamirpur, vide his order

dated 18.10.2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

amendment application had been wrongly allowed, inasmuch

as, such application had been filed in the appeal pending before

Settlement Officer of Consolidation.

4. Relying on J. Samuel and others Vs. Gattu Mahesh and

others, 2012 (2) AWC 1854 (SC) and Zamil Ahmad Vs.

Mohd. Zeeshan, 2011 (4) AWC 3802 (decision of learned

single Judge of this Court), it has been submitted that the

am

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top