Advocates:
['OM PRAKASH YADAV', 'G A', '', 'SATISH CHANDRA DWIVEDI']

Court No. - 66

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 102 of 2020

Petitioner :- Himadri Singh Sengar And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Satish Chandra Dwivedi

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

In compliance with the rule nisi issued on 03.02.2020, the

detenu Himadri Singh Sengar has been produced before

this Court by Smt. Ram Rani Singh Sengar, respondent no.

4. Sri Satish Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing

for respondent no. 4 has filed a counter affidavit. He also

identified Smt. Ram Rani Singh Sengar W/o the late

Rajesh Singh Sengar on the basis of papers produced

before him in his Chamber. Smt. Ram Rani Singh Sengar

in turn identified Smt. Himadri Singh Sengar, the detenu.

Accordingly, this Court proceeds to record the stand of the

detenu, which is recorded verbatim:

Q. Aapka Name?

Ans. Himadri Singh

Q. Aapki Aayu Kitni Hai?

Ans. 26 years.

Q. Aapke Pitaji ka Kya Name hai?

Ans. Rajesh Singh Sengar

Q. Aap Is Samay Kiske Pass Rah Rahi Hain?

Ans. Apni Maa k Pass Se.

Q. Saurabh Yadav Kaun Hai?

Ans. Mere Bhai Ka Dost.

Q. Aapne Saurabh Yadav Se Shadi Ki Hai?

Ans.Nahi.

Q. Petition ke Page No. 23 per Aapke Photographs Jo

Hain, Unke Bare Me Aapka Kya Kahna Hai?

Ans. Ye Photographs Kaise Ban Gayi, Mujhhe Nahi Pata.

Q. Aap Apni Maa Ke Pass Koi Jor Jabardasti Se to

Nahi Rah Rahi Hai?

Ans. Nahi.

Q. Aap Kahan Jana Chahti Hai?

Ans. Apne Maa Ke Pass.

Heard Sri Om Praksash Yadav, learned counsel for the

petitioners, Sri Satish Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel

appearing for respondent no. 4 and Sri Gyan Prakash

Singh, learned State Law Officer for the respondent nos. 1,

2 and 3.

Considering the stand taken by the detenu Himadri Singh

Sengar, it is evident that she is not in illegal confinement

of respondent no. 4. She is staying with the 4th respondent

of her free will and wish.

In this view of the matter, the rule nisi issued cannot be

made absolute. The rule stands discharged. This petition

stands dismissed.

Order Date :- 22.10.2020

Deepak