SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ARPITA SHARMA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 66

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 491 of

2020

Petitioner :- Arpita Sharma And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Tripathi,Ashok Kumar

Upadhyay

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

In compliance with the rule nisi issued on 05.10.2020, the

detenue, Arpita Sharma, has been produced by Santosh Paul

(789 C.P.) posted at Police Lines, Prayagraj, who has identified

the detenue. This Court, accordingly, proceeds to ascertain the

stand of the detenue in the matter, which is recorded verbatim :-

Q. Aapka naam?

A. Arpita Sharma.

Q. Aapke pitaji ka naam?

A. Shiv Kumar Sharma.

Q. Aapki aayu?

A. 19 saal.

Q. Aap kahan se aayi hain?

A. Rajapur se.

Q. Aap kiske paas se aayi hain?

A. Apne husband ke saath.

Q. Aapke husband ka naam?

A. Mohammad Zaid

Q. Unke pita ka naam?

A. Aziz Ahmad.

Q. Kya aap apni marzi se apne pati ke saath hain?

A. Ji.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.

appearing on behalf of the State.

It is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners that as of

date, the first petitioner, Arpita Sharma, is a major. Going by the

stand of the first petitioner, Arpita

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top