ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MUNNEY ANSARI AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 80
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1062 of 2020
Petitioner :- Munney Ansari And 3 Others
Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Aman Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Aman Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners,
learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1, 3 and 4 and
Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the
respondent No.2.
Sri Aman Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners
contends that the interim order was granted by the Board of
Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Allahabad in Revision No.19 of
2008-09 (Babu Vs. Gaon Sabha and another) on 16.03.2009.
The interim order was extended from time to time. However,
the interim order was not extended from the year 2018 due to
various reasons. It is contended that stay extension application
is not being heard because of absence of the member of the
Board of Revenue and for other reasons. The petitioners are
being threatened with dispossession in absence of the interim
order.
I see merit in the submission of Sri Aman Srivastava, learned
counsel for the petitioners that the remedy of re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.