SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BAJRANGPURI RAM LEELA COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['BRIJESH TIWARI', '', 'RAKESH DUBEY', 'C S C', '', 'PRADEEP KUMAR TRIPATHI', 'ADITYA BHUSHAN SINGHAL']

1

AFR

Court No. - 34

Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5179 of 2018

Petitioner :- Bajrangpuri Ram Leela Committee

Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Tiwari

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aditya Bhushan Singhal,Pradeep

Kumar Tripathi

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.

1.

This writ petition has been filed in the garb of Public Interest

Litigation (hereinafter referred to as 'PIL') alleging that private

respondents 5 to 7 have encroached upon a public Park by raising certain

construction which is causing obstruction in functioning of Ram Leela

from time to time and, therefore, direction be issued to respondents to

remove aforesaid encroachment and demolish construction so that

petitioner may perform 'Ram Leela' every year.

2.

Following prayers have been made by petitioners :-

(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus directing the respondents authorities to

restrain the private respondents not to change the

nature of public park either by raising construction or

alienating the same.

(b) Issue such any other writ or order in the nature of

mandamus directing a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top