ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. SAVITRI YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
1
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43169 of 2017
Petitioner :- Smt. Savitri Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Saran Yadav,Satya Priya Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Tripathi,Sanjay Kumar
Srivastava
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Despite repeated notice, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the sixth respondent. Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel
appearing for the sixth respondent submits that he has no instructions
from the sixth respondent.
The facts giving rise to the instant writ petition, briefly stated, is
that the petitioner claims to be a legally wedded wife of the deceased
employee, Sri Umesh Chand Yadav. He retired on attaining the age of
superannuation on 31 October 2010, from the post of Superintendent
Engineer in the Irrigation Department. From the wedlock, a daughter,
namely, Ms. Pragyan Yadav was born. It appears that the deceased
employee contracted second marriage with the sixth respondent, Ms.
Meena Yadav. Three children were begotten, namely, Neeraj Yadav,
Manoj Yadav and Km. Marshleen Yadav. From the ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.