ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
BANWARI LAL GOYAL and ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and ANR. – Respondent
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1642 of 2010
Applicant :- Banwari Lal Goyal And Anr.
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Vashisth
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Shri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant as well
as Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA appearing for the State and
perused the entire record.
The present application u/s 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer
to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.743 of 2008,
under section 138 N.I.Act, pending in the court of VIth Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that
summoning order issued in the matter is illegal. Cheques in
question were not issued against any debt or liability. It is further
submitted that the cheques in question were issued on behalf of the
Company / Firm but the Company /Firm has not been arraigned as
accused. Until and unless the Company is prosecuted, the
applicant cannot be punished. In support of his submissions,
learned counsel for the applicant has placed reliance on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.