Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Manish Mathur, J
Maya Shukla @ Maya Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Secy. / Examination Controller Lower Subordinate Service Selection Commission Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition is filed for inclusion in recruitment list. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument vs. provisions in recruitment advertisement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. dichotomy between hindi and english versions. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. article 348 necessitates english text authority. (Para 8 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion: petition dismissed favoring english version. (Para 14 , 15 , 17) |
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard Mr. Prabhat Kumar, whose power filed today is taken on record, and Mr. Jitendra Kumar learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Utsav Mishra, learned counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2, and learned State Counsel for opposite party No. 3.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the concerned authority to permit petitioner to participate and include her name in the impugned list for the post of "cutting swing" scheduled on July 29th, July 2025.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the U.P. Audhyogik Shikshan Sansthan (Anudeshak) Sewa Niyamavali 2014 the petitioner would be entitled for consideration in terms of paragraph 16(3) (ka) thereof since marks in the high school and I.T. I. certificate examinations are required to be taken into consideration in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
