SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. USHA KATIYAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['YOGESH KUMAR SAXENA', 'C S C', '', 'BHANU PRATAP SINGH', 'GAJENDRA SINGH']

Court No. - 37

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16600 of 2019

Petitioner :- Smt. Usha Katiyar

Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Saxena

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh,Gajendra Singh

Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today, is taken on

record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

Standing Counsel appearing for the State-

respondents and Sri B.P.Singh, learned counsel

appearing for the caveator.

The Institution in question is a Minority aided

Intermediate College. The petitioner claims that

she was appointed as Assistant Teacher (LT Grade)

on 10.11.2016. Her appointment was duly

approved by the competent authority and she was

admitted to salary from State Exchequer.

It appears that during the dispute between the

rival groups of Committee of Management, the

petitioner's appointment being only under

probation, was recalled on the ground of

unsatisfactory service by order dated 24.6.2017.

The writ petition with regard to the rival group

claiming control over the Institution being Writ A

No. 20661 of 2017 filed by the Commi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top