SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DINESH CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA KUMAR KHANNA – Respondent


1.

AFR

Court No. - 19

Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 7 of 2019

Revisionist :- Dinesh Chandra Gupta

Opposite Party :- Rajendra Kumar Khanna

Counsel for Revisionist :- Rama Goel Bansal

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pradeep Saxena

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.

Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.

Heard counsel for the parties.

The instant revision is directed against the order dated 3.1.2019

passed by Judge Small Causes Court in SCC Suit No. 51 of 2015,

whereby the application 42-Ga filed by the defendant-revisionist

seeking amendment in the written statement has been rejected.

By the amendment sought, the defendant-revisionist tried to

bring on record the fact that Sanjeev Kumar Khanna and Rajeev

Kumar Khanna, sons of the plaintiff are the owners and landlord of

the disputed premises and not the plaintiff. It is alleged that the sons

of the plaintiff purchased an open piece of land by registered sale

deed dated 10.1.1975. Thereafter they constructed shops over the

same including two shops in possession of the defendant-revisionist.

They also let out the shop to various tenants including the defendant-

revisionist. The plaintiff collected rent from the defendant-revi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top