Court No. - 49

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2874 of 2019

Petitioner :- Hasnain And Another

Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Shukla

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Standing

Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.

The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition

challenging the order dated 04.10.2019 passed by the

Consolidation Officer in Case No.18/905. Against the aforesaid

order, a revision was preferred by the petitioners and the same

dismissed by the Revisional Authority i.e. Deputy Director of

Consolidation, Amroha/respondent No.1 vide its order dated

22.11.2019.

A preliminary objections has been raised by Sri Ajeet Kumar

Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent

Nos.1 and 2 that the order passed by the respondent

No.2/Consolidation officer Amroha dated 14.10.2019 is an inter

locatory order. It is further argued that against the aforesaid

order, revision preferred by the petitioners was also rejected by

respondent No.1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. With the consent of

learned counsel for the parties, the matter finally and disposed

of at the admission stage itself.

From perusal of the order dated 14.10.2019 passed by

respondent No.2 it is clear that it is an interlocatory order. By

the aforesaid order, certain papers were called for the purpose

of hearing. Against the aforesaid order dated 14.10.2019 passed

by respondent No.2, which was an interlocatory order, a

revisions was preferred by the petitioners before the Deputy

Director/respondent No.1. The same was rejected by him vide

order dated 22.11.2019. The aforesaid order, respondent No.1

directed the parties to appear in the court below to argue the

matter on merits.

In view of the above, the orders, which are under challenged in

the present writ petition, are interlocatory orders and no

prejudice has been caused to the petitioners by the aforesaid

orders, hence, no interference would be called for by this Court

specially under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition is devoid of merits and dismissed.

Order Date :- 6.12.2019

saqlain