SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUDHIR AGARWAL
NEKI RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


AFR

Court No. - 34

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1856 of 1987

Revisionist :- Neki Ram

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Revisionist :- Brijesh Sahai

Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

1.

Heard Sri Bhvya Sahai, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Brijesh

Sahai, learned counsel for revisionist, learned A.G.A. for State of U.P.

and perused the record.

2.

This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397

Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated

03.12.1987 passed by Sri Y.K.Singhal, Vth Additional District and

Sessions Judge, Saharanpur, in Criminal Appeal No.51 of 1985

whereby appeal was dismissed and judgment and order dated

07.02.1985 passed by Sri Vishram Singh, Magistrate Nakur,

Saharanpur in Case No.502 of 1982 by which Revisionist was

convicted under Sections 466 and 471 IPC and sentenced to undergo

one year simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.100 under Section 466

IPC, and, six months' simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.50/- under

Section 471 IPC, has been confirmed. Both the sentences were

directed to run concurrently.

3.

Learned counsel for Revisionist contende

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top