ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KM. VINEETA – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 378 No. - 33 of 2019
Applicant :- Km. Vineeta
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Pal Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shyam Lal
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard learned counsel for both side over application moved
under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. for grant of leave to appeal for
filing appeal against judgment of acquittal passed by Court No.
2 of Additional Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, in Sessions Trial No.
229 of 2017, under Section 395 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali,
District Pilibhit.
Learned counsel for appellant argued that complainant and her
two witnesses were fully intact in their testimony, recorded
before trial court. On the basis of these evidence, those accused
persons were summoned and they stood on trial, but trial court
failed to appreciate the facts, placed on record, and on the basis
of surmises and conjectures, this impugned judgment of
acquittal, whereas case of prosecution was fully proved before
trial court. Hence, this appeal with above prayer for grant of
leave.
Learned counsel for other side as well as learned A.G.A. has
vehemently opposed the aforesaid prayer wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.