ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
SANJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41429 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
P.K.Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel for the State-
respondent.
Petitioner is before this Court assailing the order
impugned dated 13.9.2018 passed by the second respondent.
Record in question reflects that the petitioner is one of
the complainants on whose complaint the fair price shop
agreement of the fourth respondent was cancelled by order
dated 27.9.2017 passed by the third respondent. The said
order has been assailed by the fourth respondent by
preferring an appeal Case No. 1153 of 2017 (Computerised
Case No. C201709001153), under Section 28 of the U.P.
Essential Commodities Distribution Order, 2004 before the
second respondent, which has been allowed by the impugned
order dated 13.9.2018 and the fair price shop agreement of
respondent no. 4 has been restored. The petitioner was not
even a party in the appeal before the respondent no. 2.
In the case of Dha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.