SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS. – Respondent


1

Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION U/S 372 CR.P.C

(LEAVE TO APPEAL) No. - 282 of 2018

Applicant :- Manoj

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ankur Singh Kushwaha

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Daga

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant on the application

seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated

12.6.2018 by means of which the accused respondents have

been acquitted Sessions Trial No. 477 of 2011.

Learned counsel for the applicant has strongly pressed

the application with the contention that the prosecution

evidence has not been appreciated by the court concerned in

its correct perspective. He has submitted that the finding of

acquittal recorded by learned trial judge is against the evidence

on record. He next submitted that the learned trial judge has

committed a patent error of law and ignored the material

evidence on record while holding that the prosecution had failed

to prove the charge against the accused respondents beyond

the reasonable doubt.

We have perused the findings as recorded by the court

below in the impugned judgment,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top