ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ARAVIND @ KALE AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1794 of 2013
Appellant :- Aravind @ Kale And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Vikrant Rana,Deepak Dubey,Manish
Tiwary,Nikhil Kumar,Rahul Kumar Tyagi
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Vipin Kumar
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.
Heard Sri Kamal Krishna, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri
Rahul Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Rakesh
Agrahari, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the
record.
In the present case bail is being sought in appeal against the order of
conviction.
We have perused the judgment and order dated 23.03.2013 passed
by the trial court convicting the appellant.
This is the first bail application filed on behalf of appellants, namely,
Aravind @ Kale, Kavinder and Vijay Pal; during trial the appellants
are on bail which liberty has not been abused or misused by them;
they were in jail since 23.03.2013; the criminal history of the
appellants have been explained in the supplementary affidavit dated
24.10.2016. The contention is that perusal of the judgement dated
23.03.2013 of the court below shows that it has been passed in a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.