SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. SITA GATI MAGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['FROM JAIL', '', 'HEMENDRA PRATAP SINGH A C', 'A G A']

1

AFR

Reserved Judgment

Court No. - 27

Case :- JAIL APPEAL No. - 4061 of 2014

Appellant :- Smt. Sita Gati Magar

Respondent :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- From Jail, Hemendra Pratap Singh A.C Magar

Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.

connected with

Case :- JAIL APPEAL No. - 1255 of 2015

Appellant :- Smt. Samjhana Jaisi

Respondent :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- From Jail,Hemendra Pratap Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.

Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.

1.

Heard Sri Hamendra Pratap Singh, learned Amicus Curiae for the

appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

2.

Both the above Jail appeals have been filed under Section 383

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') against the judgment

and orders 26.08.2014 and 27.08.2018, passed by Sri Jitendra Kumar

Sinha, Additional Session Judge, Court No. 5, Maharajganj in Special

Case No. 01/2012 (State vs. Smt. Seeta Gati Magar) and Special Case

No. 02/2012 (Smt. Samjhana Jaisi vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case

Crime No. 930 of 2011 and Case Crime No. 931 of 2011 respectively,

under Section 8/23 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top