ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RANI SHARMA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
HABC 3133/2018
Court No. - 51
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3133 of 2018
Petitioner :- Rani Sharma And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Mohan Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh has put
in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 5 and learned AGA for the
State.
In compliance of the earlier order of this Court dated 01.05.2018, corpus
Rani Sharma has been produced before this Court from Nari Samprekshan
Grih, Nidhariya, Ballia in custody by SI Raj Singh Yadav PNO 882300045
and Lady Constable Priya Singh PNO 162192155 Police Station Sahatvar
District Ballia who has brought the girl before this Court.
Corpus Rani Sharma - petitioner has identified Sonu Sharma as her
husband, who in turn identified Rani Sharma petitioner as his wife.
The corpus is present before the Court and Court proceeds to examine the
corpus.
On being asked from petitioner "apka naam kya hai" she informs the Court
"Rani Sharma". On being asked "apke pita ji ka naam kya hai" she informs
the Court "Jaleshwar Sharma". On being further asked "apki umra kya hai"
she informs that "mein 18 se upar huu". On being further asked "kya apne
shaadi ki hai" she inform that " Ha maine Sonu Sharma se shaadi ki hai."
On being asked "kya shaadi apne apni marzi se ki hai ya kisi ke dabao me
aakar" she inform that Court clearly "ki meine apni marzi se shaadi ki hai
bina kisi ke dabao ke". On being asked "kya apke pati Sonu Sharma Court
mein aaye hai she informs that "ha aye hai". On being asked "yaha se aap
kaha jana chahti hai" she informs "mein apne pati ke sath jana chahti huu".
Learned counsel for the petitioners have drawn the attention of the Court
to the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. which is annexed at page 25 of
the writ petition.
As per medical report of CMO Ballia the age of the corpus is 18 years.
In view of the categorical statement made by corpus Rani Sharma before
this Court today, the Court has been left with no option but to allow the
petition and release the corpus in favour of her husband.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also
keeping in view the law as laid down by the Apex Court rendered in the
cases of Suhani & Another v. State of U.P. & Ors. passed in civil
appeal no. 4532 of 2018 decided on 26.04.2018 and keeping in view the
law as laid down by the Division Bench of this Court (Lucknow Bench)
rendered in cases of Vishal Jaiswal And Another v. State of U.P. and
Others passed on 26.8.2016 in Misc. Bench No. 10724 of 2016 and
Shaheen Parveen And Another vs. State of U.P. and Orthrs passed in
writ petition no. 3519 (M/B) of 2015 and by the Apex Court in the
cases of Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in 2011 (6)
SCC 396 (2014) and Shakti Vahini vs. Union of India passed in writ
petition (civil) no. 231 of 2010, no purpose would be served in keeping
the present case pending before this Court.
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The corpus Rani Sharma-
petitioner who is present in Court is released from the custody of Nari
Samprekshan Grih, Nidhariya, Ballia forthwith and she is permitted to go
wherever she wants to go. It is made clear that no hindrance will be caused
in this regard and corpus Rani Sharma - petitioner is free to move from
this Court.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018
Ujjawal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.