SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DHURV DIXIT AND 5 ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY', 'G A', '', 'RAHUL SAXENA']

Court No. - 50

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5427 of 2018

Appellant :- Dhurv Dixit And 5 Ors.

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr.

Counsel for Appellant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.

Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rahul Saxena, Advocate

on behalf of opposite party no.2 today in the

Court, is taken on record.

The present appeal has been filed under section

14-A (1) of S.C./S.T. Act against the cognizance

order dated 10.8.2018 passed by IInd, Additional

District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, S.C./S.T.

Act, Pilibhit as well as charge sheet dated

20.5.2018 in Special Sessions Trial No.140 of 2018

(State Vs Dhruv Dixit and others), Case Crime

No.59 of 2018, under sections 147, 447, 504, 506

IPC and 3(2) Va S.C./S.T. Act, P.S. Deuriya Kalan,

District Pilibhit.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned

counsel for opposite party no.2, learned AGA for

the State and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the appellants contends that

appellants have been falsely implicated by the

Village Pradhan in the F.I.R. lodged by him on

20.3.2018 at Case Crime No.59 of 2018 for the

alleged incident of sam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top