ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHD. SHAREEF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and 2 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION U/S 372
CR.P.C (LEAVE TO APPEAL) No. - 454 of 2017
Applicant :- Mohd. Shareef
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & 2 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Ansar Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Heard Sri Ansar Ahmad, learned counsel for the
appellant on the application seeking leave to appeal against
the judgment and order dated 30.10.2017 by means of
which accused respondents, namely Matloob Husain and
Sameer have been acquitted of the offences under Sections
307/34, 323/34 and 504 I.P.C.
We have perused the impugned judgement and order
and the findings as recorded therein.
Learned counsel for the appllent has strongly pressed
the application with the contention that the prosecution
evidence has not been appreciated by the court concerned
in its correct perspective. He has submitted that the finding
of acquittal recorded by learned trial judge is against the
evidence on record. He has next submitted that the learned
trial judge has committed a patent error of law and ignored
the material evidence on record while holding that the
prosecution had failed to prove the charge ag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.