ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
STATE OF U.P. – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH – Respondent
1
Court No. - 51
Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL No. - 706 of 2018
Appellant :- State Of U.P.
Respondent :- Ramesh
Counsel for Appellant :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Heard Shri Patanjali Mishra learned AGA on the application
seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated
23.5.2018 by means of which accused respondent Ramesh has been
acquitted of the offence under Sections 363, 366, 376(Gha) and 6
POCSO Act.
Learned A.G.A. has strongly pressed the application with the
contention that the prosecution evidence has not been appreciated by
the court concerned in its correct perspective. He has submitted that
the finding of acquittal recorded by learned trial judge is against the
evidence on record. He next submitted that the learned trial judge has
committed a patent error of law and ignored the material evidence on
record while holding that the prosecution had failed to prove the
charge against the accused respondents beyond the reasonable doubt.
We have heard learned AGA at great length. We have also
perused the findings as recorded by the court concerned. Perusal of
record shows that the court concerned while returning the verdict of
acq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.