SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
STATE OF U.P. – Appellant
Versus
VED PAL AND ANR. – Respondent


1

Court No. - 51

Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL No. - 699 of 2018

Appellant :- State Of U.P.

Respondent :- Ved Pal And Anr.

Counsel for Appellant :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.

Heard learned AGA on the application seeking leave to appeal

against the judgment and order dated 23.5.2018 by means of which

accused respondents have been acquitted of the offence under

Sections 498A, 304B, 201 IPC and ¾ DP Act.

Learned AGA has strongly pressed the application with the

contention that the prosecution evidence has not been appreciated by

the court concerned in its correct perspective. He has submitted that

the finding of acquittal recorded by learned trial judge is against the

evidence on record. He next submitted that the learned trial judge has

committed a patent error of law and ignored the material evidence on

record while holding that the prosecution had failed to prove the

charge against the accused respondents beyond the reasonable doubt.

We have heard learned AGA at great length. We have also

perused the findings as recorded by the court concerned. Perusal of

impugned judgment shows that the court concerned while returning

the verdict of acquittal has r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top