Advocates:
['SHAMBHU CHOPRA', 'A S G I', '', 'VINAY KUMAR PANDEY', 'RAMESH CHANDRA SHUKLA']

Court No. - 21

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 811 of 2018

Petitioner :- Imtiaz Sayed Hussain

Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shambhu Chopra

Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ramesh Chandra Shukla

Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J.

Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.

Heard Sri Shambhu Chopra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.C.

Shukla, learned counsel representing the respondents.

Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court directly against the

adjudication order in original dated 19.09.2017 passed by the Assistant

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division, Raebareli.

Sri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has

raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the present writ

petition. He has submitted that the order in original has been passed by Assistant

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division, Raebareli and the writ

petition if at all would lie before the Lucknow Bench. He has further submitted

that the petitioner should have approached the appellate Authority for the relief

so claimed by means of the present writ petition.

In response to the above objections, learned counsel