SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
TOTA RAM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['J S SENGAR', '', 'BHANU PRAKASH VERMA', 'G A']

Court No. - 43

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1628 of 1988

Appellant :- Tota Ram And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- D.V. Jaiswal

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.

Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.

The report of the C.J.M. dated 25.05.2018 indicates that

whereabouts of appellant No.1/Tota Ram are not known

for last 25 years, whereas appellant No.2/ Karua has been

duly served, but has not appeared.

The reports in so far as it relates to appellant No.1 is not in

consonance with the Circular Letters No.15/2005, VIII-

119 April 19, 2005, and 04/admin g-ii dated Allahabad

18.1.2017 of this Court, which provides that it must

contain the statement of the informant or his legal heirs, if

any.

Let a fresh report be called from C.J.M, concerned in

respect of appellant no.1/Tota Ram in the light of above

circular.

Issue bailable warrants of Rs.10,000/- against the appellant

No.2/ Karua to be executed by the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, concerned. If he is arrested or surrender before

the Court, he shall be enlarged on bail by the C.J.M,

concerned on furnishing two sureties and a personal bond

each of the like amount on the under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top