ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
TOTA RAM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1628 of 1988
Appellant :- Tota Ram And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- D.V. Jaiswal
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
The report of the C.J.M. dated 25.05.2018 indicates that
whereabouts of appellant No.1/Tota Ram are not known
for last 25 years, whereas appellant No.2/ Karua has been
duly served, but has not appeared.
The reports in so far as it relates to appellant No.1 is not in
consonance with the Circular Letters No.15/2005, VIII-
119 April 19, 2005, and 04/admin g-ii dated Allahabad
18.1.2017 of this Court, which provides that it must
contain the statement of the informant or his legal heirs, if
any.
Let a fresh report be called from C.J.M, concerned in
respect of appellant no.1/Tota Ram in the light of above
circular.
Issue bailable warrants of Rs.10,000/- against the appellant
No.2/ Karua to be executed by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate, concerned. If he is arrested or surrender before
the Court, he shall be enlarged on bail by the C.J.M,
concerned on furnishing two sureties and a personal bond
each of the like amount on the under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.