ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
OMKAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 23
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3916 of 2018
Petitioner :- Omkar Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Dubey,Manoj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has approached this Court for a writ of
mandamus directing respondent authorities to remove the
illegal encroachments allegedly made by respondent Nos.
5 and 6 over certain plots which the petitioner alleges to
have vested in the Gaon Sabha. The grievance of the
petitioner as raised in the present writ petition can be
considered under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue
Code, 2006.
The petitioner may submit a fresh representation before
the Assistant Collector bringing the relevant facts
regarding encroachment over certain plots to the notice of
the concerned Assistant Collector, who on receiving the
aforesaid representation, shall inquire into the allegations
made by the petitioner after following the procedure
prescribed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue
Code, 2006 read with Rule 67 of the Utt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.