Advocates:
['ANIL KUMAR PANDEY', '', 'MANISH KUMAR PANDEY', 'G A', '', 'GYANENDRA KUMAR SINGH']

Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3658 of 2017

Appellant :- Subhash Yadav

Respondent :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Kumar Pandey,Manish Kumar Pandey

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Gyanendra Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Hon'ble Akhilesh Chandra Sharma,J.

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.215484 of 2017.

Applicant Subhash Yadav seeks bail in ST No.162 of 2013 arising out of

case crime no.92 of 2013 u/s 302/34, 307/34, 506 I.P.C. and S.T. No.163

of 2013, arising out of case crime no.101 of 2013, u/s 3/25 Arms Act, P.S.

Haldharpur, District Mau, during pendency of the appeal.

Heard Shri K.K. Chaurasia, learned senior counsel for the appellant, Shri

R.K. Singh assisted by Shri Gyanendra Kumar Singh, for complainant and

Shri Sanjay Tripathi, learned AGA appearing for the State.

The contention of Shri K.K. Chaurasia, learned senior advocate is that

even if the entire prosecution story is believed to be true the role assigned

to the appellant is actually to the effect of exhortation and causing injury

to the injured and no role has been assigned to the appellant for causing

injury to the deceased. The criminal history of 18 cases have been