Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
RAJAN ROY, MANJIVE SHUKLA, JJ
M/S Ramesh Dyeing And Washing, Ghaziabad Thru Proprietor Ramesh Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Forest, Environment And Climate Change Deptt. Lko – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged closure and compensation orders. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction of pollution boards debated; reliance on previous rulings. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. authority of boards confirmed under water act. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 4. emphasis on environmental responsibilities and compensation mechanisms. (Para 9 , 10 , 15) |
| 5. court declined to entertain the writ petition. (Para 19 , 21) |
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Chandra Shekher Pandey, learned counsel for the Central Pollution Control Board, Shri Ashok Verma, learned counsel appearing for U.P. Pollution Control Board and Shri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. After hearing the parties and going through the record, what comes out is that by means of this petition the petitioner has challenged two orders, one is dated 12.08.2021 by which closure of the petitioner’s industrial unit was ordered and environmental compensation of Rs.14,20,000/- was imposed accordingly. Subsequently, the said order, as also another order dated 25.03.2022, which was in continuation of the earlier order, was revisited and a decision was taken on 28.06.2022
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
