JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicants, Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for State.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by Applicants for quashing the Non-Bailable Warrant dated 24.5.2022 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Agra as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.22 of 2017, Smt. Anju Vs. Anil Kumar and others, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana Rakabganj, District Agra.

3. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2-complainant submits that he does not intend to file any counter affidavit and the matter may be heard on merits. The opportunity of filing counter affidavit is hereby closed.

4. With the consent of learned counsel for parties, the matter is being heard.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel for Applicants that Applicants are father-in-law and mother-in-law of complainant. The Applicants are summoned by order dated 11.9.2017 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. A perusal of complaint would go to show that general, vague and omn