Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:11437 Reserved on 07.01.2025. Delivered on 23.01.2025.

A.F.R.

Court No. - 36 Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 844 of 2024 Appellant :- Nimmi Infratech Private Limited (Previously Satya Homes Private Limited)

Respondent :- Fundan And 9 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Mehrotra,Srijan Mehrotra,Yash Tandon Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

ANALYSIS OF BAR OF SUIT INVOKING U.P. REVENUE CODE, 2006 VIS-A-VIS REJECTION OF PLAINT UNDER ORDER 7 RULE

11 C.P.C.

THE APPEAL

1. The instant appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘C.P.C.’) assails validity of the impugned judgment and order dated 16.08.2024 and decree dated 20.08.2024 based thereupon, whereby the learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Gautam Buddha Nagar has allowed an application 20-क filed by the defendant-respondent No.6 under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. and rejected the plaint of Original Suit No.828 of 2024 (Nimmi Infratech Pvt. Limited vs. Fundan and others). The order impugned amounts to a decree under Section 2(2) C.P.C., hence this regular appeal.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The aforesaid suit was filed with the averments t