Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Santosh Rai, J
Ravindra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. implications of false accusations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to bail due to trial status. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's considerations for bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Babloo Pant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shiv Kumar Singh Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Ravindra Kumar with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 87 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, 109(1) of BNS , Police Station Sakrar, District Jhansi during pendency of trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He further submits that F.I.R. has been lodged against four persons including applicant and general and common role has been assigned to the applicant and other co-accused persons. He further submits that statement of injured Mahesh and Karan have been recorded and they have not assigned any specific role against the applicant. He further submits that as per F.I.R. version, a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
