Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, BRIJ RAJ SINGH, JJ
Deepak Kumar and another – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Transport Lucknow and 2 others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against restrictions on e-rickshaw registration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. authorities cite difficulties in serving notices. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court finds restrictions arbitrary and discriminatory. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court quashes the order and disposes of the petitions. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Heard Ms. Shraddha Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents.
2. Since, all the four writ petitions are dealing with the same issue, we have dealt with the same conjointly.
3. These four writ petitions have been filed challenging the order dated Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Transport Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Ajeet Yadav .....Petitioner(s) February 5, 2025, wherein the Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Administration Lucknow has restricted the registration of new E- rickshaws and E-autos (herein-after referred to as "E-Rickshaws") for two categories of people. Firstly, E-rickshaw registration is not to be granted to a person, who is already having a registration of E-rickshaw in his favour and secondly, new E-rickshaw registration should only be granted WRIC No. 7426 of 2025 to the person
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
