SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Online)(All) 2

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Mahajan, J
Sri Ram Mahadeo Prasad Kanpur (M/s.) v. Commissioner of Income-tax U. P. Luckno


Table of Content
1. determination of income as business revenue from leasing (Para 1 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 17)
2. assessment of commercial asset (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. use of business capital for income generation (Para 7 , 8 , 14 , 16)
4. final ruling on case reference (Para 18)

1. The questions referred for the opinion of this Court are -
1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case the oil mill is a commercial asset?
2. Whether from the facts and circumstances of this case the income arising out of the letting out of the oil mill is an income from business within the meaning of S.2(5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act and hence taxable under the Act?

2. This case relates to assessments under the Excess Profits Tax Act for the chargeable accounting periods ending 12th September 1945 and 31st March 1946. The assessee runs a flour mill and during the chargeable accounting period immediately preceding those in question in this case he constructed an oil mill but instead of running it himself leased it out to Messrs. Krishan Mohan Bhuvan Shah. The rent received was subjected to income - tax under the Income - tax Act and there is no dispute about that assessment. The Excess Pr





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top