Ishwar Dayal Applicant v. State - 1961 Supreme(Online)(All) 35

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1961 Supreme(Online)(All) 35

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Unknown Judge, J
Ishwar Dayal Applicant v. State

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges route classification. (Para 1 , 2)
2. classification authority under u.p. act established. (Para 3 , 4)
3. administrative classification upheld without prior notice. (Para 5 , 6)
4. no express obligation for notice found in the act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. re-classification does not change route conditions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. petition dismissed with costs. (Para 13 , 14)

1. The petitioner possesses a Stage Carriage Permit No. 809-1622 for his transport vehicle on the Bulandshahr, Anupshahr, Debai, Naraura and Debai - Ramghat route in the Meerut Region. This route earlier was classified as a B Class route and also approved as such by the State Transport Authority. It is said that originally it was partly metalled and partly Kankar, while the extension from Debai to Ramghat was sandy. In 1957-58 this route was extended up to Ramghat and again classified by the Regional Transport Authority as a 'B' class route. When, however, the classification made by the Regional Transport Authority came up before the State Transport Authority, the latter by its resolution, dated the 29th / 30th September, 1958, declared it to be an 'A' class route.

2. One of the co