SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Online)(All) 42

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
S. N. Dwivedi, Mukerji, JJ
U.P. State v. Murtaza Ali


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.C. Khare

1. I agree with my brother Dwivedi that the regulations published in Notification No. 6471 / XI - 226-46, dated the 29th November, 1946, and printed at p. 654 of the Municipal Manual. Uttar Pradesh, Vol. 1, 1952; are, in their application to an executive officer of a municipal board, ultra vires the State Government. Since we are overruling a decision of our brother Tandon, I consider it necessary to add a few words of my own.

2. The Municipalities Act contains different provisions regarding appointment, punishment, dismissal etc. of different classes of officers and servants, and it is by no means certain that the impugned regulations are meant to govern the dismissal, removal or reduction of an executive officer. The prevision "every order of dismissal, removal or reduction shall be in writing" means that the regulations govern the dismissal, removal or reduction by an "order" and not by a "resolution" the board.
An executive officer is liable to be punished, dismissed or removed by a special resolution of the board, (vide S.58), as well as by an ordinary resolution of the board on a recommendation, made by the President after an enquiry under S.69 - A - In either case it is the




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top