ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A.N. Verma, J
Shamshei Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details launched under article 226. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. history and ownership of the disputed property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. lease and sub-lease details and concerns raised. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. rent control officer's actions and subsequent government involvement. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. preliminary objections raised on petition's maintainability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. examination of the jurisdiction and validity of due procedures. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 7. assessing authority's jurisdiction under the act. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. determining the nature of the transactions and alterations made. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. validity of the rent control officer's determination related to the law. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 10. court's interpretation on jurisdictional powers related to letting. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. state government's jurisdiction and limitations according to the act. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 12. finality and review of the orders under s.7. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 13. implications of fictitious elements in tenancy. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 14. nature of the state government's authority in administrative matters. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 15. defining error by ju |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.