ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GUPTA, J, TAKRU, J, , CJ
Kishan Chand v. Ram Bab
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conflict between case laws referenced. (Para 1) |
| 2. initiation of the recovery suit and related allegations. (Para 2) |
| 3. court observations surrounding the obligations of pleading and proof. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. further elaboration on the burden of proof dynamics. (Para 5) |
| 5. outcome of allowing the appeal and restoring prior ruling. (Para 8) |
1. This second appeal has been referred to a Full Bench because of a conflict between Manohar Lal v. Benares Bank Ltd., AIR 1947 All. 245 and Veeravya Vandayar v. Sivagami Achi, AIR 1949 PC 319 .
2. The suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted by the respondent against the appellant for the recovery of a mortgage debt. It was contested by the appellant on several grounds including the grounds that "the defendant is an agriculturist within the meaning of U.P. Agriculturists' Relief Act xx xx and the plaintiff did not give to him a copy of the mortgage deed and consequently he is not entitled under the law to recover interest" and that the plaintiff was a creditor and he did not keep an account and did not give to him a statement of the account and is, therefore, not entitled to costs of the suit Neither did the respondent file a r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.