SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Online)(All) 9

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GUPTA, J, TAKRU, J, , CJ
Kishan Chand v. Ram Bab


Table of Content
1. conflict between case laws referenced. (Para 1)
2. initiation of the recovery suit and related allegations. (Para 2)
3. court observations surrounding the obligations of pleading and proof. (Para 3 , 4)
4. further elaboration on the burden of proof dynamics. (Para 5)
5. outcome of allowing the appeal and restoring prior ruling. (Para 8)

1. This second appeal has been referred to a Full Bench because of a conflict between Manohar Lal v. Benares Bank Ltd., AIR 1947 All. 245 and Veeravya Vandayar v. Sivagami Achi, AIR 1949 PC 319 .

2. The suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted by the respondent against the appellant for the recovery of a mortgage debt. It was contested by the appellant on several grounds including the grounds that "the defendant is an agriculturist within the meaning of U.P. Agriculturists' Relief Act xx xx and the plaintiff did not give to him a copy of the mortgage deed and consequently he is not entitled under the law to recover interest" and that the plaintiff was a creditor and he did not keep an account and did not give to him a statement of the account and is, therefore, not entitled to costs of the suit Neither did the respondent file a r



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top